See why, not just what
A score tells you what. The evidence tells you why. We show both, on every verdict.
Most threat tools hand you a number and stop. Critical. High. Medium. But a number with nothing behind it asks you to take it on faith, and faith doesn't survive a hard question from your boss or an auditor.
Open any verdict here and it unfolds. You see each source that reported the indicator, how much the system trusts that source, how recent the observation is, and where the sources agree or pull against each other. The score is just the summary of a case you can actually read.
That matters in two directions. When a verdict is right, you can explain it quickly, with evidence, to someone who wasn't in the weeds. When it's wrong, you can see why: a single noisy feed inflating things, a stale report, a source that's usually reliable but off this time. Both are impossible with a black box.
It also changes how much you can trust automation. Because the reasoning is visible, you can tune what rises for your team and catch the edge cases a model got wrong, instead of arguing with a number you can't inspect.
Transparency isn't a nice-to-have bolted onto the score. It is the score. If you can't see why, it isn't intelligence yet.
- Every verdict decomposes to its evidence, weighted by source and recency.
- Disagreement between sources is shown, not hidden.
- Low-confidence verdicts are labeled, not dressed up.